The Two Foscari †A monologue from the play by Lord Byron Essay Paper Example For Students

The Two Foscari – A monologue from the play by Lord Byron Essay Paper A monologue from the play by Lord Byron NOTE: This monologue is reprinted from Lord Byron: Six Plays. Lord Byron. Los Angeles: Black Box Press, 2007. JACOPO FOSCARI: No light, save yon faint gleam which shows me walls Which never echod but to sorrows sounds, The sigh of long imprisonment, the step Of feet on which the iron clankd the groan Of death, the imprecation of despair! And yet for this I have returnd to Venice, With some faint hope, tis true, that time, which wears The marble down, had worn away the hate Of mens hearts; but I knew them not, and here Must I consume my own, which never beat For Venice but with such a yearning as The dove has for her distant nest, when wheeling High in the air on her return to greet Her callow brood. What letters are these which Are scrawld along the inexorable wall? Will the gleam let me trace them? Ah! the names Of my sad predecessors in this place, The dates of their despair, the brief words of A grief too great for many. This stone page Holds like an epitaph their history; And the poor captives tale is graven on His dungeon barrier, like the lovers record Upon the bark of some tall tree, which bears His own and his beloveds name. Alas! I recognize some names familiar to me, And blighted like to mine, which I will add, Fittest for such a chronicle as this, Which only can be read, as writ, by wretches. We will write a custom essay on The Two Foscari – A monologue from the play by Lord Byron Paper specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now

comparison between Un and EU essays

comparison between Un and EU essays The purpose of this paper is to make a general overview of the main differences between the United Nations and the European Union. According to this aim, this essay will be divided into five parts: after a brief introduction, Im going to deal with three aspects in which these two entities differ, namely their Origins and the relationship with the Sovereignty of the member states, the means to implement decisions in the Security field and the decision-making process within the bodies of the two entities. Then I will try to make some conclusions based on the areas compared. The most important international organizations in the world today are the United Nations (UN) and its affiliated bodies, and the European Union (EU). Both of them were born in the aftermath of the second World War, in order to avoid new massacres and destructions. However they have different origins and have developed different aims and structures. On the one side the United Nations officially came into existence in 1945. The aim of this Organization, as the preamble of the Charter claims, is to prevent the future generations from the burden of War. In addition Art.1 of the Charter provides four main purposes, namely to maintain international peace and security, to develop friendly relations among nations; to achieve international co-operation in solving international problems; to be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends. As far as sovereignty is concerned it can be said that the United Nations is an INTER-GOVERNAMENTAL Organization made of independent sovereign states. Thus the UN Charter is one of the strongest guardian of sovereignty, enshrining that principle as one of its central pillars. However most of the problems the world faces today are of such complexity that they cannot be addressed by any single nation acting alone. Therefore the UN is a global forum where countri es come together to address c...

Literature Survey on Implementation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Literature Survey on Implementation - Essay Example This volume intends to survey the means and insights in sending a wake-up call that moved the general observation and that goes beyond simple examination. On realization of a widening gap between the conception and implementation of policies, Mazmanian, Daniel, Paul (125) initiated a wave of critics in response to the noted political irresponsibility. In his book, Bardarch (55) imprints a deep message that sort to effect more congruence within the public policy processes to consequently ensure that the legislated actions and policies intentions were carried out in actual sense and in reality. They wrote their books based on the relevance basing their sentiments to the ongoing discussions and debates about the credibility of the government to challenge the true democratic reorganization (Mazmanian, Daniel, Paul, 124). The work is very relevant and extends a helping hand to assist in the much-needed debate concerning the administrative underpinning of the governance, which came at a time of the fall of the unresponsive, and unaccountable government had yet not found any lasting solution for public management. One cannot fail to note the compelling effect and clarity of vision they all bring to the issue. In their book, Pressman, Jeffrey, and Aaron (70) presents a picture the general society would not admire. The book is not optimistic at all; as the theme course along the concept of â€Å"declare it done and it will be done† method of central control that is mostly satisfied in just having a good policy or a great legislation without giving much regard to the means by which is will get executed. Denhardt (22) employs powerful stands and perspectives to develop and create a ground to consider critically the issue of implementation. As of today, he takes the task of redefining the study of the structure of administration in relation to public policy. He offers a detailed and refined examination of the vital elements about both the potential for success and